
Editorial Note: A gold standard exists when the commonly-used currency uses everyday paper and coins and digital transfers, except that this “paper” currency is convertible into a predefined, unchangeable amount of 99.99% pure gold.
What if you prayed relentlessly: “God, please design the perfect money for us humans on earth.” The “perfect money,” you tell God, needs to have the following attributes:
Oh, wait…God has answered your prayers already. Or you may prefer to say Mother Nature has, if you are not a theist. Gold has all those eight properties listed above. No wonder once gold became known, it has been in use for an estimated 5,000 years.
But is gold the “best sound money there is”?
Money needs to serve as a unit of account and as a store of value, and thus become a medium of exchange.
Why do some things become money?
Why do some things become money? Economist Ludwig von Mises was the first to deduce that before something becomes money spontaneously in society, it must already be in use and be regarded as valuable. Gold became money long before any kings or governments recognized it as such. In the free market, it easily beat other precious metals, seashells, copper, and bags of wheat or corn. It was crowned the “best money there is” by the market, not by some bureaucrat.
The total supply of gold is limited. About 220,000 metric tons of gold have been mined, which leaves about 55,000, or 25% of total supply in the earth’s crust, available for further mining. But exploration has costs, as do refining and purifying. Remote mines of less pure gold do not become economic unless the price of gold in the currency in use rises substantially. This is why the almost-indestructible supply of gold does not rise too fast; it never has. That makes the best money “sound” money as well.
A hundred years of no inflation meant outstanding economic growth. It’s an inflationary economy that aids grifters and hustlers.
During the century from 1814 to 1914, the UK was on a gold standard (the US was on a bimetallic gold and silver standard till 1900). That means the supply of money by government was tied to the gold reserves it had. And, during this time, the purchasing power of the pound sterling and the US dollar stayed constant. A basket of goods in 1914 cost the same in commodity-backed currency as in 1814. This is despite huge shocks to the system like the American Civil War (1861-65). A hundred years of no inflation meant outstanding economic growth. It’s an inflationary economy that aids grifters and hustlers. For a little while, Australia, too, benefited from being on the gold standard (since Australia was using British currency), but it came off the gold standard in 1929.
How did inflation come to be regarded as a necessary evil? It’s the biggest scientific scam of all time, running for almost a hundred years now, eclipsing even the climate racket which began with the Club of Rome in 1968. For clarity on the greatest racket ever, see: “Will the Greatest Scam of All Time Ever Come to Light?”
It’s the biggest scientific scam of all time, running for almost a hundred years now.
Only confused public servants or politicians who care naught for the people love inflation. It’s never announced as a tax, but a tax it nevertheless is. It surreptitiously hurts the middle-income and lower-income classes. The gold standard had disciplined governments into balancing their budgets or backing the debt with gold reserves. Without that backing, the state could spend merrily with fiat money, meaning money created at will, and deficits could be monetized for the inflation tax that was levied without Congress/Parliament’s knowledge, let alone oversight or approval. What fun.
Here is a graph that may surprise you:
Can we dare to ask, “Has the median house price in Sydney stayed the same over the last 15 years?” It may be economic heresy to say so, but if gold was still the medium of exchange, house prices have stayed about the same.
The US Constitution (ratified in 1789) denied the government the right to print money without a commodity backing. Article I, Section 10 of the US Constitution prohibited states from making anything but gold and silver coin a legal tender in payment of debts. However, during the Civil War, the US government issued “greenbacks”—paper debts without the backing of gold or silver. In 1870, this action was regarded as unconstitutional. But in 1871, two cases (Knox v. Lee and Parker v. Davis), reversed the precedent and ruled that paper currency was legal tender—and fiat currency was born. In 1933, President Roosevelt ordered that citizens’ gold be confiscated at US$35 an ounce. In 1975, holding gold became legal again in the US, at which time the market was at US$185 an ounce! Till 1971, only other sovereign nations could (and did) demand gold at $35 an ounce by exchanging US sovereign bonds for gold, but by then fiat had hugely diluted the value of the currency, and President Nixon decided to close this gold window. 1971 was the nail in the coffin for gold, but fiat money had already ruled the world since 1929.
In 1900, the US Gold Standard Act made gold the exclusive monetary standard at US$20.67 per troy ounce. Today it’s about 237 times that.
The (US) dollar originally meant 24.1 grams of pure silver. The pound also was, and still is, a unit of weight. But “pound sterling” meant a pound of ‘sterling’, meaning 92.5% pure silver. A foot is still 12 inches. And a meter is still 100 centimeters. These conversion metrics need to be permanent. But currencies are now so divorced from their original meaning, being fixed units of weight of a metal, that no one connects the two anymore. In 1900, the US Gold Standard Act made gold the exclusive monetary standard at US$20.67 per troy ounce. Today it’s about 237 times that, like one meter getting redefined as 23,700 centimeters.
Bitcoin’s algorithm is undoubtedly a clever ruse at mimicking gold. It has outdone gold for the first five of those eight properties we noted above. The eighth is a function of the top seven, and Bitcoin’s labyrinthine complexity—a tortuous algorithm, desk warriors “mining” while sitting at their desks, a thing that’s not a coin, not something you can feel, touch, or see, with massive swings in its purchasing ability—makes it a favorite pastime and investment among the alienated IT crowd that celebrates distrust. Not merely justifiable distrust of central banks controlling the money supply levers, but all distrust.
But one can’t have a civilization if everyone distrusts everyone else. You can’t be your own doctor, plumber, farmer, carpenter, masseuse, and dentist. The modern economy thrives on specialization and is intricately interconnected—perhaps 99% of humanity didn’t know where the Strait of Hormuz was until a few weeks ago, but now 99% do.
But one can’t have a civilization if everyone distrusts everyone else.
Bitcoin fails the aesthetic test (number 6), but, for a few, mathematics has an innate beauty. To some eyes, Satoshi Nakamoto’s Bitcoin algorithm is a Picasso or a Rembrandt. Isaac Newton may agree, but an illiterate granny in Africa who proudly bequeaths her jewelry to her daughter will shake her head. A genuine medium of exchange needs to be understood by everyone, like dollars are today. Only then can it be used to pay billions for a corporate takeover, a few hundred for a smart TV at a retail shop, or as a fiver to a barista for a shot of caffeine.
But Bitcoin’s biggest shortcoming is not property eight, it is number seven. Seven is the raison d’être of all good money. It’s the reason why, when rapacious investment banks short gold in the hope of creating a panic, they do not succeed. How come? Well, there are buyers of gold waiting. Jewelers make up 46% of all demand, and bullion makers make up another 25%. They are only too happy to build up their inventory, if gold drops a lot relative to the US dollar. And, of course, the rest of the demand comes from all those industrial uses and central banks, who, too, are happy to buy low and arrest the fall.
But Bitcoin? Without a use, a utility, it’s just a greater-fool mechanism. In contrast to gold, most of Bitcoin’s sundry buyers are in it only for a speculative gain—not for them the virtue of setting a new monetary standard, not for them the value of a gold necklace, not for them the beauty of mathematics encrypted in software.
Bitcoin’s floor is a zero price.
If Bitcoin begins to worry the central banks and governments, they may seek to deter its customers by undoing its anonymity, creating a panic by shorting the asset, or publicly declaring it the abode of criminals. Without a prior utility, Bitcoin is not money—it fails Mises’s money test. And that’s why the shorts may succeed. A panic sets in, and the price keeps falling; Bitcoin’s floor is a zero price. Then the central banks not only make money from the shorts but kill off this valueless upstart who dared to dream of replacing fiat currencies one day.
Bitcoin faces competition from several other cryptocurrencies, too – there are now 11,000 of them! Some, but not all, also have a maximum limit on their output. Bitcoin’s is 21 million coins of which just over 20 million have been “mined” by “Keynesian” work.
What’s Keynesian work? Get a hundred people to dig a large hole for 50 hours a week. Pay them $100 an hour. Then, in the second week, pay them all the same rate for another 50 hours to fill up the hole. GDP is up by $1 million.
But what real work has been done? What value has been added?
The answer: Nil. Nada. Zip. It’s just “Keynesian” work. Bitcoin’s miners solve cryptographic puzzles and consume electricity when they are “mining.” They are rewarded with Bitcoins.
Dear reader, you can solve crosswords, too, but don’t charge me for your intellectual stimulation.
Most cryptos are like hot-air balloons.
Most cryptos are like hot-air balloons: the promoters make a buck—they sell when the balloon is high, but you and I can get caught in the inevitable crash. But all cryptos (save those mimicking an existing fiat currency) fail comprehensively at properties 6 to 8. Especially at the critical 7—they have no fundamental value, all buying is being done in the hope of a greater fool in the future.
My contention must be clear now: Gold is God’s money, Bitcoin is fool’s gold.
It’s possible to trade with gold in minute quantities when you have bank accounts in milligrams of gold (1 milligram of gold today is worth about 21 Australian cents, 14 American cents). There are also gold products like Tether Gold and Pax Gold which set gold accounts on a blockchain—Bitcoin’s supposed nirvana of all things anti-government. Perth Mint is a private organization, and its receipts are trusted worldwide for integrity in bullion quality and safe storage. All these allow you to “digitize” gold and make it fast, highly divisible, and easy to transfer if that’s your preference.
The vast majority of merchants worldwide do not accept Bitcoin per se, so Bitcoin users lose plenty of fees in getting their Bitcoin changed into dollars or euros at the point of payment. Some other cryptos are reportedly faster and cheaper. Meanwhile, new payment systems for fiat currencies, like Venmo, are offering mostly fee-free transactions.
Visa, Mastercard, PayPal, and banks have centralized ledgers with multiple firewalls that elicit easier insurance protection from hacking. However, one-third of all Bitcoin exchanges may have been hacked into, making insurers wary.
A new upstart finds it impossible to displace the established currency unless that currency suffers hyperinflation.
Credit card transactions occur at the rate of over 25,000 per second worldwide – not something Bitcoin’s decentralized ledger can ever do. In comparison, one Bitcoin transfer takes 10 minutes or more in the “decentralized” ledgers.
Financial technology for fiat currencies keeps getting better. A new upstart finds it impossible to displace the established currency (known as the network effect) unless that currency suffers hyperinflation, and then, any replacement will do.
The trick is to use the best of this financial technology, currently wedded only to dollars and such, while switching to sound money. Which means getting the Australian dollar back on a sound footing.
Politically, it requires three steps:
Politically, these three steps are not an easy hill to climb on a quiet afternoon. They’re rugged mountains, and it will require a tough trek over many a day.
But the avid Bitcoin dream—inciting a society, ignorant of the fiat-money racket, to spontaneously evolve a new money, specifically Bitcoin (overcoming the vast network effect)—is far more improbable—think Mount Everest with a half-depleted oxygen tank. Good luck.
This essay was first published by Spectator Australia on April 26, 2026 under the title “God’s Money and Fool’s Gold.”